Your trademark question starts with your business: what you offer, where you plan to operate, and what you need to protect.
Our team helps bring that context into a clear scope for professional review.
Before engagement, we confirm who is responsible for the work and what the agreed scope includes.
Why Trademarkora exists
One experience should not hide local accountability.
Trademarkora brings your trademark information and filing options together. OpenPTO coordinates cross-border work. Peter Lin and his team lead strategy and China trademark assessment.
We confirm the responsible professional and service scope before engagement.
How the structure works
One platform. Local accountability.
1
Client-facing decision and application platform
Trademarkora
Trademarkora gives clients one place to search, plan classes, compare countries, review pricing and request a professional check.
2
Operating and coordination network
OpenPTO
OpenPTO provides cross-border coordination for Trademarkora.
3
Founder & Global Trademark Strategy Lead
Peter Lin & team
Peter Lin and his team lead trademark strategy and China trademark assessment.
A discussion around a shared board.
How responsibility becomes visible
Prepared with technology. Owned by people.
Trademarkora is built around a practical division of responsibility: software organises records and scope; an attributable professional owns the recommendation; the customer owns purchase and final application approval.
Technology + human review
Technology organises. People decide.
AI: organises records, scope and evidence.
Professional: owns the recommendation.
Customer: owns purchase and final application approval.
Local professional: handles jurisdiction-specific work where required.
Quality and accountability
Know the scope before you engage.
Responsible entity and professional disclosed before engagement.
Scope, price, included work and exclusions kept visible.
No government filing without applicant approval.
Published prices and Exact Quote scopes stay clearly separated.
Peter Lin · Founder
Built by an IP practitioner
Peter Lin
Founder & Global Trademark Strategy Lead
Peter Lin and his team lead trademark strategy and China trademark assessment.
The context behind the work
From a conversation to a considered next step.
A trademark question brings together business plans, records and application details. Careful preparation helps the professional reviewer see how those pieces fit together.
The agreed scope identifies the work to be done and who is responsible for it. That clarity should stay with you beyond the first conversation.
What can a preliminary professional check tell you?
The check gives a direction for the proposed filing scope: Proceed, Modify or Stop, with up to three main reasons and a next step. This hypothetical example shows the structure; it does not assess or clear a trademark.
Example direction: Modify the preparation
A software business needs to clarify the offering and mark versions before settling its proposed filing scope.
Up to three main reasons
The downloadable product and hosted service have not been separated.
The intended countries need confirmation.
The logo is changing, so the version to assess is unsettled.
A practical next step
Confirm what customers receive, the intended markets and the current name or artwork. The professional can then complete the relevant check. You decide whether to purchase filing services after the result and confirmed scope.
Limits of this example and the check
No database search was performed for this example. The free check is not a full legal opinion, unlimited alternative-name search, dispute analysis or guarantee of registration.
No payment is required to request the check. Using Search or AI class suggestions first is optional.
Who prepares information, and who owns the advice?
Source-based preparation
Trademarkora prepares guides and links the official sources behind factual statements. A source-check date records that research; it is separate from a legal effective date or a professional review date.
Individual professional responsibility
The responsible local professional, contracting entity and scope are disclosed before engagement. A Founder role or an operating-network reference does not establish a professional licence in every jurisdiction.
An honest review record
An article does not claim an individual attorney review unless that review is actually recorded. Preparation examples are hypothetical; public source material is not presented as a client success story.
