China classification guide
China Trademark Classes and Similar Groups
A Nice class is the international organizing layer; China's similar groups and specific item wording add the local filing detail. Choosing a class number alone is not enough. Start with what the business actually sells or provides, map it to official items, then have the final China scope confirmed.
What to take away
- The Nice Classification has 45 classes: goods in Classes 1–34 and services in Classes 35–45.
- China's similar-group framework sits inside the class structure and can affect how items are searched and compared.
- Applications use specific goods or service item wording, not only a broad class heading or a similar-group label.
- The AI Class Checker suggests WIPO-backed items; it does not replace professional confirmation of a China specification.
Find a preparation example for your business
Start with what the customer receives, then return to the China item wording and similar-group guidance below. These examples help you describe the offering; they do not select classes for you.
1. Start with the Nice Classification
The Nice Classification is an international system for organizing goods and services in trademark applications. It has 45 classes, with goods in Classes 1 through 34 and services in Classes 35 through 45. A class is a navigation tool: it helps locate the area where a product or service belongs and gives trademark offices a consistent way to record scope.
A class title is not a shopping basket that automatically covers everything underneath it. The application must describe the particular goods or services. CNIPA guidance states that applicants should use specific item names and should not submit only the class title or similar-group name as the goods-or-services description. That is why a useful intake starts with natural-language business activity rather than asking an ordinary user to guess class numbers.
2. Understand China's similar groups
China uses the Nice class structure and also publishes a table that organizes goods and services into similar groups. These groups are sometimes informally called subclasses. They are used as an important reference for search, examination and administration, but they should not be treated as a universal mathematical rule about every commercial relationship.
Two items in one class may sit in different similar groups. Conversely, local notes can identify relationships that are easy to miss when looking only at the class heading. The current version matters because CNIPA updates the materials when a new Nice edition takes effect and may adjust local item names or group relationships.
3. Select concrete, standard goods and service items
Good item wording is specific enough for the office and the applicant to understand the claimed activity. 'Technology' or 'consumer goods' is too broad to show what the business actually does. A better starting description names the product, delivery method and customer-facing service: downloadable mobile software, hosted software, online retail services, clothing, footwear or business consulting.
CNIPA's application guidance distinguishes the six-digit item names from four-digit similar-group codes and explains that item descriptions should be concrete, accurate and standardized. When a planned item is not listed exactly, classification requires careful selection under the current rules. A Resource page should not invent a plausible item or promise that a broad phrase will be accepted.
4. Separate the goods from selling or supporting them
A frequent mistake is to assume that protection for a product automatically describes every service used to market it. The goods themselves and retail, advertising, business administration, repair, education or software services can sit in different classes. A clothing brand may need to describe clothing goods, while a marketplace using the same sign may also have retail or platform services to consider.
The same distinction appears in software. Downloadable software, software development and software provided online are not interchangeable phrases. The right scope depends on the real product and business model. Build a list of current and near-term activity, then prioritize it; do not add unrelated classes simply because more classes look broader.
5. Use the AI Class Checker as a structured first pass
Trademarkora's AI Class Checker accepts a plain-English description and suggests items from the project's official WIPO Nice Classification source. Typing does not send a request; an explicit action produces the suggestions. Users can review class-level recommendations and individual official items before carrying the selected scope into the existing filing intake.
The checker is designed to reduce classification friction, not to issue a final China filing specification. It does not create a second search, a second intake or an independent filing form. Final item wording, coverage priorities and any China similar-group implications remain subject to attributable professional review.
6. Confirm the scope before relying on price or filing preparation
Class count can affect a price preview, but the price should follow a defensible scope rather than drive users to choose arbitrary classes. Review the proposed item list for duplicates, gaps and activities the business does not actually plan to use. Keep each jurisdiction as its own scope because local item practice can differ even when the same Nice classes are involved.
A material change to goods or services can invalidate earlier evidence, professional results or quotes. The safest handoff records the business description, suggested classes, selected official items, target jurisdiction and the version of the source used. A professional can then confirm or adjust the scope, and the customer can decide whether to continue.
Worked example
Example: a direct-to-consumer footwear company
A founder describes 'trainers sold through our own online store, plus a mobile loyalty app.' Footwear points toward goods in Class 25, while online retail services and the software/app activity raise separate service and software questions. Entering only 'Class 25' would hide the other parts of the business and make later price or search context unreliable.
The better workflow is to describe each real activity, use the Class Checker to review official items, remove anything not planned, and carry the selected list into the China scope. A professional then confirms the filing wording and relevant local similar-group questions before a case-specific recommendation.
Mistakes to avoid
- Choosing a class from a competitor's filing without checking your own goods and services.
- Submitting a class heading or similar-group code as if it were the complete item list.
- Assuming all items in one class are treated as identical in China.
- Confusing products with retail, advertising, repair or software services.
- Adding speculative classes to make a filing look broader without a business rationale.
- Treating an AI suggestion as the final professional classification decision.
Official sources used
These links support the general process described here. Records and guidance can change, so case-specific facts still need current-source verification and attributable human review.
Official China classification materials and filing guidance.
Official explanation of class titles, similar groups and specific item names.
Official international class structure and current edition resources.
Choose your next action
Use the working tool when you need more evidence. Use the professional check when the evidence must become a case-specific recommendation. You remain in control of any purchase or filing decision.
Learn from public China trademark cases
Read the selected MUJI proceedings with the precise signs and products in view.
China Trademark Case Studies →